[scponly] new patch: fix basename(3) segfault

[Ensel Sharon]

On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Kaleb Pederson wrote:

> Ensel,
> 
> Did you ever get everything working?  The last message I saw indicated that 
> you still didn't have it working?
> 
> > I put in the edits you listed, and things compiled/run cleanly, however
> > the behavior has not changed.
> 
> If you have everything working, then we should definitely make the necessary 
> changes.


No, I don't have everything working.  I'm glad you jogged my memory - I
put in the code edits that Paul gave me, but the behavior did not change -
even when I switched over to /home//incoming format.

So actually, it looks like you shouldn't add those patches.

But, it would be nice if unison did actually work.  It seems very odd that
scponly is advertised to work with both rsync and unison, and yet rsync
support is totally unusable until (perhaps) now, and unison remains so.

I mean, honestly, how could you put rsync supprt into scponly, and not
notice that --server could not be called (thus rendering rsync support
totally useless) ?