[PRL] Bob Harper's new blog

[Karl Lieberherr]

Hi Dave:

well said. One of those oo styles is Bryan Chadwick's DemeterF style.
It has a very functional orientation.

OO is good for modeling the application world and related abstractions
from requirements to implementation and Bob is not going to change that.
Misuse happems with any style.

-- Karl

On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Dave Herman <dherman at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
> There are more styles of OO in heaven and earth, Bob, than are dreamt of in
> your philosophy.
>
> Dave "JS and Rust" Herman
> --
> Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>
> Asumu Takikawa <asumu at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
>>
>> On 2011-03-16 18:59:13 -0400, Dimitris Vardoulakis wrote: > What are the
>> arguments for OO being anti-modular and anti-parallel? Is > there a pointer
>> to a paper or blog post or sth? Riccardo is right. Quoth Bob Harper in his
>> latest blog post: Worse, object-oriented programming, a species of
>> imperative programming, is fundamentally antimodular because of the absurd
>> emphasis on inheritance and the reliance on class-based organizations in
>> which functionality metastasizes throughout a program. Cheers, Asumu
>> ________________________________
>> PRL mailing list PRL at lists.ccs.neu.edu
>> https://lists.ccs.neu.edu/bin/listinfo/prl
>
> _______________________________________________
> PRL mailing list
> PRL at lists.ccs.neu.edu
> https://lists.ccs.neu.edu/bin/listinfo/prl
>
>