[PRL] Bob Harper's new blog
Dimitris Vardoulakis
dimvar at ccs.neu.edu
Wed Mar 16 18:59:13 EDT 2011
What are the arguments for OO being anti-modular and anti-parallel? Is there
a pointer to a paper or blog post or sth?
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 2:59 PM, William D Clinger <will at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
> Mitch wrote:
> > The first few posts have been interesting.
>
> That's a polite way of putting it.
>
> > Link:
> > http://existentialtype.wordpress.com/2011/03/15/teaching-fp-to-freshmen/
>
> Clicking on the archive link, I read his essay on "Boolean
> Blindness". The first sentence of its sixth paragraph is
> flat-out wrong, but it seems unfair to mention just that
> one sentence when so many others vie for that distinction.
>
> I also noticed this tidbit from "Teaching FP to freshmen":
>
> Object-oriented programming is eliminated entirely
> from the introductory curriculum, because it is both
> anti-modular and anti-parallel by its very nature,
> and hence unsuitable for a modern CS curriculum.
>
> From what I understand, we have a possibly moribund committee
> that's supposed to decide what if anything can be done about
> CS 3500, Object-Oriented Design. Just in case any other
> members of that committee are reading this, I move that Bob
> Harper's sentence above be adopted as that committee's main
> recommendation to our dean.
>
> Will
>
> _______________________________________________
> PRL mailing list
> PRL at lists.ccs.neu.edu
> https://lists.ccs.neu.edu/bin/listinfo/prl
>
--
Dimitris
-------------- next part --------------
HTML attachment scrubbed and removed
More information about the PRL
mailing list