[PRL] A type-based solution to the "strings problem":

[Matthias Felleisen]

Will accused Cormac of thoughtlessness. I was trying to figure out  
with respect to what. Or in comparison to what.

Always civil -- Matthias


On Oct 20, 2006, at 10:41 AM, Mitchell Wand wrote:

> Umm, I've lost track of the argument here.
>
> Exactly what is the problem to which the R6RS editors seem to have
> given no thought? (Yes, I'm sure there are many, but what was the one
> that Matthias was asserting?).
>
> What are the attributes that Matthias is asking Will to apply to the
> R6RS editors?
>
> Are these attributes of the editors personally, or attributes of the
> R6RS draft that they produced?
>
> Civilly,
> --Mitch
>
> On 10/20/06, Matthias Felleisen <matthias at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 20, 2006, at 9:58 AM, William D Clinger wrote:
>>
>> > Matthias wrote:
>> >> Following in this vein, it is clear that the R*RS editors seem to
>> >> have given this problem no thought either.
>> >
>> > It's not the only problem.  We could make a list.
>> > In fact, we *should* make a list.  Indeed, people
>> > *are* making a list.  Please join in!
>>
>> So do you want to apply the same attributes to the R*RS editors? --
>> Matthias
>>
>>