[PRL] AOP questions
Matthias Felleisen
matthias at ccs.neu.edu
Tue Mar 29 22:41:08 EST 2005
On Mar 29, 2005, at 10:26 PM, John Clements wrote:
> No: the big thing that's missing in this "functional AOP" model that
> I think most AOP-ers find central to AOP is the idea of CFLOW-like
> pointcuts, that don't have to do with replacing one function with
> another but rather with replacing one dynamic execution path with
> another. That is, they want their join-point matching to extend
> beyond the static context of the event being matched, so that they can
> say things like "any call to method m() that's within the dynamic
> extent of a call to method p()".
As n dynamic-wind? -- Matthias
More information about the PRL
mailing list