[PRL] AOP questions

Matthias Felleisen matthias at ccs.neu.edu
Tue Mar 29 22:41:08 EST 2005


On Mar 29, 2005, at 10:26 PM, John Clements wrote:

> No:  the big thing that's missing in this "functional AOP" model that 
> I think most AOP-ers find central to AOP is the idea of CFLOW-like 
> pointcuts, that don't have to do with replacing one function with 
> another but rather with replacing one dynamic execution path with 
> another.  That is, they want their join-point matching to extend 
> beyond the static context of the event being matched, so that they can 
> say things like "any call to method m() that's within the dynamic 
> extent of a call to method p()".

As n dynamic-wind? -- Matthias




More information about the PRL mailing list