[Linux-users] /arch/linux

[Matthew Perry]

	What do you mean by standard stow package directory?  Here is what I meant to get across.  On the linux box have:

	/arch -> /net/arch-linux  symlinked
	/arch/stow   To stow things in
	/arch/{bin, etc, ...} that stow symlinks to
	/arch/{xapps, com, ...} -> /arch  symlinked


--
 Thanks
 Matthew Perry

On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Marc Reichman wrote:

> ii think you have a few points confused. 
> 
> under /net
> it's /net/arch-solaris
> which is symlinked to /arch on the suns.
> 
> we'd have /net/arch-linux
> which symlinks to /arch on the new boxes
> i'd honestly prefer a standard stow package directory with bin,etc,include,...
> and the packages in a stow or package directory.
> 
> Xapps, unix, daemons, can all be symlinked to .
> which would let paths like /arch/Xapps/bin/aterm (as an example)
> work fine.
> 
> sound ok?
> 
> 
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 02:55:56PM -0500, Matthew Perry wrote:
> 
> > 	At the last meeting the idea of a /arch/linux came up.  The big question is how it should be setup.  I'm going to throw my two-cents in and try to see what everyone thinks.
> > 
> > 	I would set up it up in the following way:
> > 
> > 	/arch/linux
> > 	/arch/linux/stow  (for stowing each package)
> > 	/arch/linux/linux/(bin, etc, include ...) with everything in here simlinks from stow.
> > 	/arch/linux/com -> /arch/linux/linux (same for Xapps, adm ...)
> > 	
> > 	This way solaris paths would still work when we mount /arch/linux on /arch.  Please offer other ideas if you have them.
> > 	
> > 
> > 
> > --
> >  Thanks
> >  Matthew Perry
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-users mailing list
> > Linux-users@lists.ccs.neu.edu
> > https://lists.ccs.neu.edu/bin/listinfo/linux-users
> 
> -- 
> -marc
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-users mailing list
> Linux-users@lists.ccs.neu.edu
> https://lists.ccs.neu.edu/bin/listinfo/linux-users
>