[Linux-users] /arch/linux

[Marc Reichman]

ii think you have a few points confused. 

under /net
it's /net/arch-solaris
which is symlinked to /arch on the suns.

we'd have /net/arch-linux
which symlinks to /arch on the new boxes
i'd honestly prefer a standard stow package directory with bin,etc,include,...
and the packages in a stow or package directory.

Xapps, unix, daemons, can all be symlinked to .
which would let paths like /arch/Xapps/bin/aterm (as an example)
work fine.

sound ok?


On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 02:55:56PM -0500, Matthew Perry wrote:

> 	At the last meeting the idea of a /arch/linux came up.  The big question is how it should be setup.  I'm going to throw my two-cents in and try to see what everyone thinks.
> 
> 	I would set up it up in the following way:
> 
> 	/arch/linux
> 	/arch/linux/stow  (for stowing each package)
> 	/arch/linux/linux/(bin, etc, include ...) with everything in here simlinks from stow.
> 	/arch/linux/com -> /arch/linux/linux (same for Xapps, adm ...)
> 	
> 	This way solaris paths would still work when we mount /arch/linux on /arch.  Please offer other ideas if you have them.
> 	
> 
> 
> --
>  Thanks
>  Matthew Perry
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-users mailing list
> Linux-users@lists.ccs.neu.edu
> https://lists.ccs.neu.edu/bin/listinfo/linux-users

-- 
-marc