[Larceny-users] writing values writes the first value only
Abdulaziz Ghuloum
aghuloum at gmail.com
Thu Jun 4 04:04:38 EDT 2009
On Jun 4, 2009, at 10:32 AM, David Rush wrote:
> This is one of those things where
> the explicit use of a continuation function is both conceptually
> cleaner and easier to use than the built-in solution
This is self-contradictory. If you believe continuations should take
a single value only, then you should apply the same principle to your
continuations too. If your continuations take multiple values, then
why do you feel icky when built-in continuations do the same?
Aziz,,,
[with apologies to the original poster who explicitly did intend to
start this argument]
More information about the Larceny-users
mailing list