[Larceny-users] recursive lists and C-c problems

[David Van Horn]

William D Clinger wrote:
> Marco Maggi wrote:
>>> v0.97b1 is newer and should have fewer bugs.
>> Is it also still open to very small non-language
>> related changes?
> 
> Yes.
> 
>> Fine. But is there a switch that makes larceny print
>> some non-infinite output in
>> R6RS-compatible-mode-for-everything-else?
> 
> No, but there should be.  I'm waiting to see what
> happens with SRFI 38 and SRFI 97.

SRFI 97 should be final by the end of the week.  SRFI 37 was one of the 
omitted SRFIs from that proposal, so what exactly are waiting to see 
about, or what would you like to see happen with SRFI 97 in regard to 
SRFI 37?

Thanks,
David