[Cs4800] Counting tournament tonight at 10 pm

Srinivas N Jay srinivasnjay at gmail.com
Mon Nov 14 23:06:55 EST 2011


Hi Dennis,

I get that. Now we are talking :) That's exactly is my point. We were asked
to bring back kicked out avatar to the tournament. Since we were not sold
to that idea, we dint implement it. We will talk to Professor tomorrow and
see what we can do.

Thanks a lot,
Srinivas

On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Dennis Zografos <dzog at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:

>
> ----- "Srinivas N Jay" <srinivasnjay at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Dennis,
> >
> > I agree with you when you said, not the best, but not exactly
> > "unfair". But the system is not fundamentally flawed. I think, the
> > system was originally designed to find the best avatar with zero
> > tolerance. When I say zero tolerance, avatar should handle all valid
> > claims, solve any given valid instance and many more rules like these.
> > If an avatar failed to comply with any of these rules, there is no
> > point in allowing it to participate in rest of the tournament.
>
>
> I get that.  "Zero tolerance" is not the problem, nor is ejecting.
> That all makes sense :)
>
> The fundamental flaw was with the *scoring*.
>
> With ejection, and without score adjustment, two avatars which are
> *PERFECT* zero-tolerance implementations could end up with different
> scores, based SOLELY on the ORDER of their turns with respect to
> when other avatars get ejected.
>
> Do you know what I mean?  (Please let me know!)
>
>


-- 
***Race A Race Where You Are The Goal For Every Opponent! - *N Jay****

Srinivas *N Jay*
srinivasnjay at gmail.com
+1(617)-817-0913
-------------- next part --------------
HTML attachment scrubbed and removed


More information about the Cs4800 mailing list