[scponly] Request: Backported security patch for 4.0

[Benjamin Donnachie]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Thomas Wana wrote:
> Until then, scponly in Debian Stable will be vulnerable :-(

Forgive me if this is a daft question - but why can't you just put a
newer version in Debian stable?

Ben
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
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=RMAj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----