[PRL] Subrefereeing for POPL 09

[Mitchell Wand]

No, though you should note this in your report.  --Mitch

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:35 PM, Aaron Turon <turon at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:

> Mitch,
>
> Is it a conflict of interest to act as a subreviewer when you have a
> paper submitted to the conference?
>
> Thanks,
> Aaron
>
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Mitchell Wand <wand at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
> > Hi folks!
> >
> > I'm on the POPL program committee, too, so it's time for me to solicit
> > subreferee reports from you guys, like I did for ICFP.
> >
> > Rather than having me trying to figure out which papers might be
> interesting
> > to which people, I'm going to ask you to volunteer to review one or two
> > papers that you think might be interesting to you.  If I don't get
> > volunteers, then I'll go back to the other system .  I signed up for some
> of
> > these papers precisely because I figured I could get good subreferee
> reports
> > from one or more of you.
> >
> > I thought this worked really well last time, so I'm trying it again.
> >
> > Details:
> >
> > The papers that I've been assigned are in the table at
> > https://wiki.ccs.neu.edu/display/~wand/POPL+2009+Subreferee+Signup<https://wiki.ccs.neu.edu/display/%7Ewand/POPL+2009+Subreferee+Signup>.
> The
> > links in the table should work. (Damn, I love emacs keyboard macros!).
> > Feel free to add author names to the table.
> > Please sign up for papers by editing the "referees" column in the table.
> > (I'll automatically be notified by email).
> > I'd like to have your reports by 8/15.
> > If you are a grad student, don't spend more than two days on a paper.
> > Your report needn't be tremendously formal or detailed. Please submit
> your
> > report by emailing it to me as a text attachment.
> > Look at my csg711 "Professional Resources" web page for useful materials
> on
> > how to write a referee's report. (NOTE: The link there is broken. I found
> it
> > here: The Task of the Referee --Dave H.)
> > Yes, I know you have no idea what the rest of the submission pool looks
> > like.  But you can assess its quality against other POPL papers you've
> read
> > in the past, and you can assess internal consistency, clarity, etc.
> > I will be reading and independently assessing each paper myself, so don't
> > worry about making mistakes in judgement.  If your report is good, I'll
> rely
> > on it.  If I think you're off base, I'll ignore it.  Either way, you'll
> get
> > a credit as a referee.
> > All these are submissions, so you should keep the contents confidential
> to
> > the lab, unless there is a public copy on the web somewhere.
> >
> > OK, that sounds way more complicated than it is.  I'm sure I've left
> > something out; please feel free to ask questions.
> >
> > Remember, please: refereeing is an important service to the community.
> The
> > better the referee reports, the better and the more reliable the entire
> > conference (and journal) submission process is.  So please do your part!
> > _______________________________________________
> > PRL mailing list
> > PRL at lists.ccs.neu.edu
> > https://lists.ccs.neu.edu/bin/listinfo/prl
> >
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
HTML attachment scrubbed and removed