[PRL] Why knowing Haskell is bad
shivers at ccs.neu.edu
shivers at ccs.neu.edu
Fri Oct 6 10:27:56 EDT 2006
From: Matthias Felleisen <matthias at ccs.neu.edu>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 09:20:01 -0400
It's what I want to achieve (roughly) and I know, I do so. Read and
weep.
--> http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog.php?id=1107301645
Someone has to create an applicative version of Java/C# libs, which
is what my ECOOP talk proposed. I bet that, plus some syntax, would
go a long ways to better software dev/programming
Insufficient, I think, to simply whip up some pure functional libs for Java &
C#. Would the pragmatics be there? That is, would you get the kind of
performance you'd get using those idioms in MLton? Cost models and notational
overhead both have impact on how programmers program.
I think it would be better to start fresh, as PLT is doing with Honu.
-Olin
More information about the PRL
mailing list