[PRL] Practise talk Monday 26 10am 366 WVH
Karl Lieberherr
lieber at ccs.neu.edu
Mon Jun 26 10:01:06 EDT 2006
Reminder: Talk is now.
-- Karl
On 6/21/06, Therapon Skotiniotis <skotthe at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
>
> All,
>
> I'll be giving a practise talk (aka Torture Chamber Session) on
> Monday 26, 10:00am in 366 WVH in preparation for ECOOP.
>
> You are all invited.
>
>
> Title: "Demeter Interfaces: Adaptive programming without surprises"
> Date: Monday, June 26th, 10:00am
> Place: 366 WVH
>
> Abstract:
>
> Adaptive Programming (AP) provides advanced modularization mechanisms
> for traversal related concerns over data structures in object-oriented
> programs. Computation along a traversal is defined through specialized
> visitors while the traversal itself is separately defined against a
> graph-based model of the underlying data structure with the ability
> to abstract over graph node names and edges. As such, modifying, under
> certain restrictions, the program's data structure does not alter the
> program's overall behavior. Even though AP is geared towards more easily
> evolvable systems, certain limitations of current AP tools hamper code
> reuse and system evolvability. Reasoning about adaptive code becomes
> difficult since there is no guarantee that a modification to a data
> structure will not alter the meaning of the program. Furthermore,
> adaptive programs are defined directly against a program's complete
> underlying data structure exposing unrelated information and introducing
> hardcoded dependencies decreasing reusability, modularity and hampering
> evolution.
>
> In this paper we present Demeter Interfaces through which
> a more thorough design method of adaptive programs allows for more
> resilient software. Traversal specifications and Visitors are defined
> against an interface class graph augmented with additional constraints
> that capture structural properties that must hold in order for the
> adaptive code to function correctly. A program implements a Demeter
> interface by providing a mapping between the program's concrete data
> structure and the interface class graph. We show how Demeter interfaces
> allow for higher levels of reusability and modularity of adaptive code
> while the static verification of constraints guards against behavior
> altering modifications.
>
> -- Theo
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PRL mailing list
> PRL at lists.ccs.neu.edu
> https://lists.ccs.neu.edu/bin/listinfo/prl
>
More information about the PRL
mailing list