[PRL] the "success" of types

[Paul A. Steckler]

> 6. Very little else has leaped from FP. More type stuff exists that 
> could be used. 

Well, see Erik Meijer's ramblings on Visual Basic, where 
he points out patterns that have analogs in Haskell.  

I can see the analogies, but they're pretty contorted.  
You have to stand on your head and squint to make them
work. 

I guess that just reinforces the point made.

-- Paul