[PRL] aspects to eliminate aspects

[Robby Findler]

At Wed, 18 May 2005 13:18:03 -0400, Mitchell Wand wrote:
> RF> Can't you just avoid calling proceed in the advice that advises other
> RF> advice?
> 
> No, if the interfering advice was an around advice, then that would
> skip both the advice and the method call that invoked it.  (Right?)

Oh, right! Duh. The code that triggers the advice is stuck into the
method's body, too. It seems impossible to avoid it :(

Robby