[Larceny-users] [plt-scheme] Re: side effects in R6RS modules

[namekuseijin]

On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 3:09 PM, William D Clinger <will at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
> Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>> You'd be surprised. I have read those 'formal comments'; I just don't
>> think they contain any reasons to downgrade the formal semantics into
>> an optional appendix. Not one. Not a single one.
>
> Well, no one ever said the R6RS was perfect.

huh, I believe I remember someone saying that. :)

oh, man, this is much fun...