[Larceny-users] Syntax violations need &syntax

[Derick Eddington]

On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 16:01 -0700, Derick Eddington wrote:
> Per R6RS 5.5 "Syntax violations", the below exceptions must have a
> condition with type &syntax.

This also (same for syntax-rules):

> (show-ex (let-syntax ((sc (lambda (stx)
                              (syntax-case stx ()
                                ((_ x) #'x)))))
             (sc)))

Syntax violation: sc

Invalid form

Form: (sc)

Trace: 

  (sc)

  (lambda ()
  (let-syntax
    ((sc (lambda (stx) (syntax-case stx () ((_ x) #'x)))))
    (sc)))

  ((lambda ()
   (let-syntax
     ((sc (lambda (stx) (syntax-case stx () ((_ x) #'x)))))
     (sc))))

((#<record &error> ())
 (#<record &who> (syntax-violation))
 (#<record &message> ("sc: Invalid form"))
 (#<record &irritants> (((sc)))))

> 


-- 
: Derick
----------------------------------------------------------------