[Larceny-users] is this a brain-problem or a bug?

[Ray Racine]

On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 11:32 +0000, David Rush wrote:

> There was also no change in behavior when I changed the
> sockaddr_un.sun_family field to be socket/AF_LOCAL in the Larceny
> code. So unfortunately, I do not think this is really the problem in
> this code.

Another shot in the dark...

FCGI_LISTENSOCK_FILENO from a google search appears to be defined to be
0 (stdin).  I'm wondering if Larceny's REPL is interfering with your
socket reading from stdin.  This could explain why your getting an
accept but the read appears to block (hung) looking for 8 bytes
absconded by the REPL (talk about larceny!).

I did not get chance yesterday, but tonight I hope to get a chance to
actually try running your sample code.

Ray