[Larceny-users] on porting to larceny

[David Rush]

sorry to be pedantic about something that is basically pretty much
correct, but...

2008/12/30 William D Clinger <will at ccs.neu.edu>:
> The errno business is a crock, but it's C's crock so we
> have to respect it.  In C, everything preserves a nonzero
> errno; that's true of Larceny as well.

s/C/Posix/g preserves the truth value of the above statements does it
not? I mention this because the Win32 API appears to (modulo analogies
and certain linker options) at least maintain per-thread error
entries.

Basically, I hate seeing Larceny, which I use because it is *not*
dependent on a C compiler, coupling it's semantics to one of the more
annoying C lossages.

david rush
-- 
GPG Public key at http://cyber-rush.org/drr/gpg-public-key.txt