[Larceny-users] visibility of bindings inside macros

[Jon Wells]

I don't know if this is a generic scheme question or a larceny
question...

What is it that makes definitions for standard parts of the language
visible at XXX below and it be illegal to refer to a definition of one's
own creation?

    (import (rnrs))

    (define-syntax blarg
      (lambda (form)

        ;; XXX 

        (syntax-case form ()
          ((_ crud ...)
              :

No need to expound on "that's what the standard says" if that's the
case.

jon.