[Larceny-users] Commutativity

richard rush kumoyuki at gmail.com
Tue Feb 13 04:38:20 EST 2007


On 2/12/07, William D Clinger <will at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
> The best solution would be to rewrite the code
> generator yet again, but a good interim solution
> would be to improve the choice of order of
> evaluation, assuming the R6RS lets us do that.

Well I hope that since you're on the committee (well I thought you
were last time I looked which was *ages* ago) that it will. I realize
that R6RS is progressing into the 'real-world', but I think it would
be a huge loss to lose *any* of compiler optimizations because of
standardization language - and I say this even though I was bitten
last night by current Twobit's reordering of LET-bindings where I was
reading from a file. I deserved it :)

david
-- 
Once you label me, you negate me
    - Soren Kierkegaard



More information about the Larceny-users mailing list