[Larceny-users] Larceny basics

[Dan Muresan]

Thanks for all the details!

> p.s. (Only if you're interested) there is one feature missing from  
> the above SRFI-55 implementation that I, as a user, would desire:  
> expansion of a require-extension form should extend the compile-time  
> syntactic environment with any syntax that is provided by the SRFI's  
> that the form is requiring.

You mean for SRFIs that export macros, like SRFI-42?

Are you making a distinction between interpreted and compile-time?


Best,
Dan