[Cs5500] [Cs4800] New Valid Function - Re: Playgrounds HSR and MMG under attack
Dennis Zografos
dzog at ccs.neu.edu
Sun Nov 20 09:05:02 EST 2011
Hi,
Some questions/concerns about this:
The original valid() was both too restrictive and too permissive.
Yours is too permissive, in a new way.
hsr(0,*) is not a valid instance. Its solution is not h0 as your
tests claim. Its solution does not exist. A safest rung can not
be determined when there are no rungs. Quality is also
definitionally undefined for n=0; it looks like you've hacked the
quality function to define it.
More information about the Cs5500
mailing list