[Cs5500] New Design For OpposeAction
Paarth Chothani
chothani.p at husky.neu.edu
Sat Mar 19 16:27:48 EDT 2011
Hi Folks,
While doing implementation, we (BostonChargers) found that the design of
OpposeActions was not proper as, we had to iterate over "oppose"
<claimsToOppose> List(Claim) in the request to find out the claims which
have been strengthened, opposed & agreed.
Here is our new design for OpposeAction:
OpposeAction = "strengthen" List(Claim) "refuting" List(Claim) "agree"
List(Claim)
where List(Claim) for strengthen will contain claims with updated qualities
List(Claim) for refute will contain the list of claims refuted
List(Claim) for agree will contain list of agreed claims
The advantage of having such design is that there is no need to iterate over
the "oppose" <claimsToOppose> List(Claim) to figure out which claims have
been strengthened, opposed & agreed.
Please let us know about this design change ASAP.
--
Sincerely,
Paarth Chothani
Research Assistant & Graduate Student,
College of Computer & Information Science,
Northeastern University.
-------------- next part --------------
HTML attachment scrubbed and removed
More information about the Cs5500
mailing list