[Cs4800] Algorithm reviews

[Karl Lieberherr]

We will use the following order:
1. David (HSR and MMG)
2. Dennis (HSR and MMG)
3. Leighann and Liz (MMG only)
4. Greg and Casey (HSR and MMG)
5. Matthew Pelland (HSR and MMG)
6. Lukasz and Max (HSR, and MMG (with the bug and then without))
7. Nimrod and Ryan (HSR only)
8. Brett (MMG only)
9. Mike and Chris (MMG only)
10. Adam Belcher (HSR only)

-- Karl
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Karl Lieberherr <lieber at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:

> For the avatar code reviews on Monday and Wednesday come prepared to
> present your avatars. Have them on your laptop or memory stick or on the web
> so that you can display your code quickly in the class room.
>
> In your algorithm/code review include the following points (you are
> welcome to include any other points that help to "sell" your
> algorithm/implementation):
>
> HSR:
> 1. What is the high-level algorithm you used in the solve method?
>    Do you compute first the minimum number of questions you need followed
> by computing the decision tree? How do you assign the questions asked at
> every
>    internal node?
> 2. How did you implement the solve method:
>    2.a Additional data structures used that were not already in the
> playground of baby avatar.
>    2.b Analysis of running-time of your implementation.
>
> MMG:
> 1. High-level algorithm for opposeOrAgree(refute, strengthen; agree),
> provide and solve.
> 2. What did you approximate the desired value?
>
> For both avatars:
> Which features of your avatar
>   were the most challenging to implement?
>   made it more competitive?
> How hard was it to implement a functioning algorithm on a scale from 1 to
> 10?
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
HTML attachment scrubbed and removed