[Cs4800] New Valid Function - Re: Playgrounds HSR and MMG under attack
    Dennis Zografos 
    dzog at ccs.neu.edu
       
    Sun Nov 20 09:05:02 EST 2011
    
    
  
Hi,
Some questions/concerns about this:
The original valid() was both too restrictive and too permissive.
Yours is too permissive, in a new way.
hsr(0,*) is not a valid instance.  Its solution is not h0 as your 
tests claim.  Its solution does not exist.  A safest rung can not 
be determined when there are no rungs.  Quality is also 
definitionally undefined for n=0; it looks like you've hacked the 
quality function to define it.
    
    
More information about the Cs4800
mailing list